Multiplexer, high-frequency front-end circuit, and communication device

ABSTRACT

A first filter of a multiplexer includes a ladder filter structure of acoustic wave resonators. An imaginary line obtained by connecting second ends of electrode fingers included in one comb-shaped electrode among a pair of comb-shaped electrodes of each resonator intersects a reference line that is a straight line extending in an acoustic wave propagation direction. When an angle defined by the reference line and the imaginary line of a first series resonator is represented by a first slant angle, an angle defined by the reference line and the imaginary line of a parallel resonator is represented by a second slant angle, and an angle defined by the reference line and the imaginary line of acoustic wave resonators is represented by a third slant angle, at least one of the first slant angle and the second slant angle is larger than the third slant angle.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of priority to Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-192108 filed on Sep. 29, 2017 and is a Continuation Application of PCT Application No. PCT/JP2018/035558 filed on Sep. 26, 2018. The entire contents of each application are hereby incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to a multiplexer provided with a filter including acoustic wave resonators, a high-frequency front-end circuit, and a communication device.

2. Description of the Related Art

In recent years, to support a plurality of frequency bands and a plurality of wireless schemes, or multiband and multimode, using a single terminal, multiplexers for separating (splitting) a high-frequency signal into individual frequency bands have been widely used in communication devices such as mobile phone terminals. As a filter used in such a multiplexer, a filter device including acoustic wave resonators has been proposed (see, for example, International Publication 2015/098756). In this filter device, IDT (InterDigital Transducer) electrodes of the acoustic wave resonators are arranged to be slanted relative to an acoustic wave propagation direction to suppress the transverse-mode ripple in the pass band of the filter.

However, the filter described in International Publication 2015/098756 in which IDT electrodes are arranged to be slanted has a problem in that spurious responses due to higher-order modes are likely to occur in a frequency band (stop band) higher than its pass band.

Such higher-order mode spurious responses are not characteristically problematic in the pass band of the filter. In a multi-filter configuration in which paths extending through a plurality of filters are interconnected, however, such higher-order mode spurious responses may affect the characteristics of another filter and cause deterioration. Specifically, if the frequency at which a higher-order mode spurious response has occurred lies in the pass band of another filter, the higher-order mode spurious response may cause an increase in the ripple in the pass band (pass band ripple) of the other filter.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Preferred embodiments of the present invention provide multiplexers, high-frequency front-end circuits, and communication devices in each of which a higher-order mode spurious response generated in the stop band of a filter is able to be significantly reduced or prevented.

A multiplexer according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention includes a common terminal, a first terminal, and a second terminal; a first filter provided on a first path electrically connecting the common terminal and the first terminal, the first filter including a plurality of acoustic wave resonators; and a second filter provided on a second path electrically connecting the common terminal and the second terminal, the second filter having a pass band that is higher in frequency than the first filter. The plurality of acoustic wave resonators include two or more series resonators provided on the first path, and one or more parallel resonators each provided on a path electrically connecting a node on the first path and ground. A first series resonator that is closest to the common terminal among the two or more series resonators is electrically connected to the common terminal without the one or more parallel resonators therebetween. Each of the plurality of acoustic wave resonators includes an IDT electrode defined by a pair of comb-shaped electrodes provided on a substrate having piezoelectricity. Each of the pair of comb-shaped electrodes of each of the plurality of acoustic wave resonators includes a plurality of electrode fingers that extend in a direction perpendicular or substantially perpendicular to an acoustic wave propagation direction, and a busbar electrode that connects first ends of the plurality of electrode fingers to each other. An imaginary line obtained by connecting second ends of the plurality of electrode fingers included in one comb-shaped electrode among the pair of comb-shaped electrodes intersects a reference line that is a straight line extending in the acoustic wave propagation direction. When an angle defined by the reference line and the imaginary line of the first series resonator is represented by a first slant angle, an angle defined by the reference line and the imaginary line of a first parallel resonator that is closest to the common terminal among the one or more parallel resonators is represented by a second slant angle, and an angle defined by the reference line and the imaginary line of the rest of the plurality of acoustic wave resonators is represented by a third slant angle, at least one of the first slant angle and the second slant angle is larger than the third slant angle.

As described above, IDT electrodes are provided such that the imaginary line described above and the reference line described above intersect, that is, IDT electrodes are slanted relative to the acoustic wave propagation direction. This arrangement is able to significantly reduce or prevent generation of the transverse-mode ripple in each resonator. In addition, the IDT electrode of the series resonator that is the closest to the common terminal is more slanted than the IDT electrodes of the rest of the plurality of other acoustic wave resonators. This arrangement is able to significantly reduce or prevent the higher-order mode spurious response of the series resonator, which largely affects the second filter. With this configuration, it is possible to significantly reduce or prevent the higher-order mode spurious response generated in the stop band of the first filter and to reduce the insertion loss in the pass band of the second filter.

Further, at least one of the first slant angle and the second slant angle may be greater than or equal to about 2.5° and less than or equal to about 10°.

With this configuration, it is possible to further significantly reduce or prevent the higher-order mode spurious response generated in the stop band of the first filter.

Further, each of the first slant angle and the second slant angle may be larger than the third slant angle.

As described above, setting each of the first slant angle and the second slant angle to be larger than the third slant angle is able to significantly reduce or prevent the higher-order mode spurious response that affects the second filter. With this configuration, it is possible to significantly reduce or prevent the higher-order mode spurious response generated in the stop band of the first filter and to reduce the insertion loss in the pass band of the second filter.

A multiplexer according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention includes a common terminal, a first terminal, and a second terminal; a first filter provided on a first path electrically connecting the common terminal and the first terminal, the first filter including a plurality of acoustic wave resonators; and a second filter provided on a second path electrically connecting the common terminal and the second terminal, the second filter having a pass band that is higher in frequency than the first filter. The plurality of acoustic wave resonators include one or more series resonators provided on the first path, and two or more parallel resonators provided on paths electrically connecting the first path and ground. The two or more parallel resonators include a first parallel resonator positioned on the common terminal side, and a parallel resonator positioned on the first terminal side, as viewed from a first series resonator that is closest to the common terminal among the one or more series resonators. Each of the plurality of acoustic wave resonators includes an IDT electrode defined by a pair of comb-shaped electrodes provided on a substrate having piezoelectricity. Each of the pair of comb-shaped electrodes of each of the plurality of acoustic wave resonators includes a plurality of electrode fingers that extend in a direction perpendicular or substantially perpendicular to an acoustic wave propagation direction, and a busbar electrode that connects first ends of the plurality of electrode fingers to each other. An imaginary line obtained by connecting second ends of the plurality of electrode fingers included in one comb-shaped electrode among the pair of comb-shaped electrodes intersects a reference line that is a straight line extending in the acoustic wave propagation direction. When an angle defined by the reference line and the imaginary line of the first parallel resonator is represented by a first slant angle, an angle defined by the reference line and the imaginary line of the first series resonator is represented by a second slant angle, and an angle defined by the reference line and the imaginary line of the rest of the plurality of acoustic wave resonators is represented by a third slant angle, at least one of the first slant angle and the second slant angle is larger than the third slant angle.

As described above, IDT electrodes are provided such that the imaginary line described above and the reference line described above intersect, that is, IDT electrodes are slanted. This arrangement is able to significantly reduce or prevent generation of the transverse-mode ripple in each resonator. In addition, the IDT electrode of the parallel resonator that is the closest to the common terminal is more slanted than the IDT electrodes of the rest of the plurality of other acoustic wave resonators. This arrangement is able to significantly reduce or prevent the higher-order mode spurious response of the parallel resonator, which largely affects the second filter. With this configuration, it is possible to significantly reduce or prevent the higher-order mode spurious response generated in the stop band of the first filter and to reduce the insertion loss in the pass band of the second filter.

Further, at least one of the first slant angle and the second slant angle may be greater than or equal to about 2.5° and less than or equal to about 10°.

With this configuration, it is possible to further significantly reduce or prevent the higher-order mode spurious response generated in the stop band of the first filter.

Further, each of the first slant angle and the second slant angle may be larger than the third slant angle.

As described above, setting each of the first slant angle and the second slant angle to be larger than the third slant angle is able to significantly reduce or prevent the higher-order mode spurious response that affects the second filter. With this configuration, it is possible to significantly reduce or prevent the higher-order mode spurious response generated in the stop band of the first filter and to reduce the insertion loss in the pass band of the second filter.

Further, the substrate may include a piezoelectric layer having a principal surface on which the IDT electrodes are provided, a high-acoustic-velocity support substrate in which a bulk wave propagates at a higher acoustic velocity than an acoustic velocity of an acoustic wave that propagates in the piezoelectric layer, and a low-acoustic-velocity film that is provided between the high-acoustic-velocity support substrate and the piezoelectric layer and in which a bulk wave propagates at a lower acoustic velocity than an acoustic velocity of a bulk wave that propagates in the piezoelectric layer.

With this configuration, the Q value of each resonator including an IDT electrode provided on a substrate having a piezoelectric layer can be maintained at a high value.

Further, a frequency of a higher-order mode spurious response generated by the first filter may be included in the frequency pass band of the second filter.

With this configuration, it is possible to significantly reduce or prevent the higher-order mode spurious response generated in the stop band of the first filter and to reduce the insertion loss in the pass band of the second filter.

Further, a high-frequency front-end circuit according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention includes a multiplexer according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, and an amplifier circuit electrically connected to the multiplexer.

With this configuration, it is possible to provide a high-frequency front-end circuit in which the higher-order mode spurious response generated in the stop band of the first filter is able to be significantly reduced or prevented and in which the insertion loss in the pass band of the second filter can be reduced.

Further, a communication device according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention includes an RF signal processing circuit that processes a high-frequency signal to be transmitted or received by an antenna element, and a high-frequency front-end circuit according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, which transmits the high-frequency signal between the antenna element and the RF signal processing circuit.

With this configuration, it is possible to provide a communication device in which the higher-order mode spurious response generated in the stop band of the first filter is able to be significantly reduced or prevented and in which the insertion loss in the pass band of the second filter can be reduced.

In the multiplexers and the like according to preferred embodiments of the present invention, it is possible to significantly reduce or prevent the higher-order mode spurious response generated in the stop band of a filter.

The above and other elements, features, steps, characteristics and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments with reference to the attached drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a basic configuration diagram of a multiplexer common to preferred embodiments of the present invention and a comparative example.

FIG. 2 is a circuit configuration diagram showing a first filter of the multiplexer according to the comparative example.

FIG. 3 is a diagram showing a higher-order mode spurious response generated in the stop band of the first filter according to the comparative example.

FIG. 4 is a diagram describing the return loss of the first filter in the comparative example.

FIG. 5 is a circuit configuration diagram showing a first filter of the multiplexer according to Preferred Embodiment 1 of the present invention.

FIG. 6 includes a plan view and a cross-sectional view showing an acoustic wave resonator of the first filter according to Preferred Embodiment 1 of the present invention.

FIG. 7A is a plan view of a series resonator that is the closest to a common terminal in the first filter of Preferred Embodiment 1 of the present invention.

FIG. 7B is a plan view of a parallel resonator that is the closest to the common terminal in the first filter of Preferred Embodiment 1 of the present invention.

FIG. 7C is a plan view of the other acoustic wave resonators in the first filter of Preferred Embodiment 1 of the present invention.

FIG. 8 is a diagram showing a change in the impedance of the acoustic wave resonator according to Preferred Embodiment 1 of the present invention.

FIG. 9 is a diagram showing the relationships between frequency and phase for the acoustic wave resonator according to Preferred Embodiment 1 of the present invention.

FIG. 10 is a diagram showing the relationship between a first slant angle of the acoustic wave resonator according to Preferred Embodiment 1 of the present invention and the phase.

FIG. 11 is a circuit configuration diagram of a first filter according to Modification 1 of Preferred Embodiment 1 of the present invention.

FIG. 12 is a plan view of a parallel resonator that is the closest to the common terminal in the first filter of Modification 1 of Preferred Embodiment 1 of the present invention.

FIG. 13 is a circuit configuration diagram of a first filter according to Modification 2 of Preferred Embodiment 1 of the present invention.

FIG. 14 is a circuit configuration diagram of a first filter of the multiplexer according to Preferred Embodiment 2 of the present invention.

FIG. 15A is a plan view of a parallel resonator that is the closest to the common terminal in the first filter of Preferred Embodiment 2 of the present invention.

FIG. 15B is a plan view of a series resonator that is the closest to the common terminal in the first filter of Preferred Embodiment 2 of the present invention.

FIG. 15C is a plan view of the other acoustic wave resonators in the first filter of Preferred Embodiment 2 of the present invention.

FIG. 16 is a circuit configuration diagram of a first filter according to Modification 1 of Preferred Embodiment 2. of the present invention.

FIG. 17 is a configuration diagram of a high-frequency front-end circuit according to Preferred Embodiment 3 of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Background to Present Invention

First, the background to the present invention will be described with reference to FIG. 1 to FIG. 4. FIG. 1 is a basic configuration diagram of a multiplexer 1, which is common to both preferred embodiments of the present invention and a comparative example. In FIG. 1, an antenna element 2 connected to a common terminal Port1 is also shown.

The multiplexer 1 includes the common terminal Port1, a first terminal Port11, a second terminal Port21, a first filter 11, and a second filter 21. The first filter 11 is arranged on a first path r1 connecting the common terminal Port1 and the first terminal Port11. The second filter 21 is arranged on a second path r2 connecting the common terminal Port1 and the second terminal Port21. The pass band of the second filter 21 is higher in frequency than that of the first filter 11.

FIG. 2 is a circuit configuration diagram showing the first filter 11 of the multiplexer 1 according to the comparative example.

The first filter 11 according to the comparative example is a ladder filter including a plurality of acoustic wave resonators. The first filter 11 includes series resonators S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5, which are acoustic wave resonators arranged on the first path r1, and parallel resonators P1, P2, P3, and P4, which are acoustic wave resonators arranged on paths connecting the first path r1 and ground. The series resonators S1 to S5 are arranged in the stated order from the common terminal Port1 toward the first terminal Port11. The parallel resonator P1 is connected between the series resonators S1 and S2, the parallel resonator P2 is connected between the series resonators S2 and S3, the parallel resonator P3 is connected between the series resonators S3 and S4, and the parallel resonator P4 is connected between the series resonators S4 and S5. All or some of the series resonators S1 to S5 and the parallel resonators P1 to P4 are hereinafter sometimes referred to as “resonators”.

A problem that can occur in the multiplexer 1 according to the comparative example will be described with reference to FIG. 3. FIG. 3 is a diagram showing a higher-order mode spurious response generated in the stop band of the first filter 11 according to the comparative example. In FIG. 3, the thick line in the graph indicates an impedance characteristic of the series resonator S1 having a resonant frequency f1 and an anti-resonant frequency f2, and the thin line in the graph indicates the insertion loss of the first filter 11 and the insertion loss of the second filter 21.

A higher-order mode spurious response appears as, for example, a ripple-shaped impedance disturbance at frequencies higher than an anti-resonance point of a resonator. As shown in FIG. 3, if a higher-order mode spurious response caused by any resonator of the first filter 11 occurs at a frequency f3, a portion of a signal of the frequency f3 to be reflected by the first filter 11 is not reflected and is lost, and a pass band ripple appears in the second filter 21. The pass band ripple causes insertion loss in the pass band of the second filter 21. To reduce the insertion loss of the second filter 21, the higher-order mode spurious response caused by a resonator of the first filter 11 is to be significantly reduced or prevented.

As described above, arranging IDT electrodes of resonators to be slanted relative to the acoustic wave propagation direction is able to significantly reduce or prevent the transverse-mode ripple in the pass band of the first filter. However, when IDT electrodes are arranged to be slanted, a higher-order mode spurious response is likely to occur. Accordingly, it is a challenge to suppress the higher-order mode spurious response as much as possible while arranging IDT electrodes to be slanted to significantly reduce or prevent the transverse-mode ripple.

A description will now be given of, among the plurality of resonators included in the first filter 11, a resonator whose higher-order mode spurious response more largely affects the second filter 21, that is, a resonator whose higher-order mode spurious response is significantly reduced or prevented to effectively reduce the insertion loss of the second filter 21.

FIG. 4 is a diagram describing the return loss of the first filter 11 in the comparative example. FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an increment of return loss obtained when a predetermined frequency signal is input to the first filter 11 in which a resistor is added to one of the plurality of resonators, compared with the return loss obtained when a predetermined frequency signal is input to the first filter 11 from the common terminal Port1 side. The predetermined frequency signal to be input to the first filter 11 is a signal including a frequency that lies in the stop band of the first filter 11 and that lies in the pass band of the second filter 21.

The addition of a resistor to a resonator simulates the generation of a higher-order mode spurious response in the resonator. The return loss of the first filter 11 increases by different amounts in accordance with the resonator to which a resistor is added, that is, the resonator in which a higher-order mode spurious response is generated.

The return loss is the reflection loss of the first filter 11 seen from the common terminal Port1. The greater the return loss, the smaller the reflection of a signal by the first filter 11. That is, a frequency signal in the pass band of the second filter 21 is absorbed by the first filter 11, and the insertion loss of the second filter 21 increases.

As shown in FIG. 4, the increment of return loss is at most about 0.7 dB when a resistor is added to the series resonator S1, which is the closest to the common terminal Port1, and the increment of return loss is at most about 0.38 dB when a resistor is added to the second closest parallel resonator P1. In contrast, the increment of return loss is at most about 0.05 dB when a resistor is added to the third closest series resonator S2, and the increment of return loss is approximately 0 dB when a resistor is added to each of the fourth and subsequent closest resonators P2 to P4 and S3 to S5, in which case the return loss is regarded as substantially not increasing. As described above, the increase in the return loss of the first filter 11 is larger when a higher-order mode spurious response is generated in a resonator positioned closer to the common terminal Port1, more specifically, the series resonator and the parallel resonator in the initial stage on the common terminal Port1 side. Accordingly, to reduce the insertion loss of the second filter 21, it is effective to take measures to significantly reduce or prevent the higher-order mode spurious response for the series resonator and the parallel resonator in the initial stage on the common terminal Port1 side.

In the multiplexer 1 of this preferred embodiment, while each of the resonators included in the first filter 11 includes a structure that significantly reduces or prevents a transverse-mode ripple, a resonator positioned close to the common terminal Port1 includes a structure that significantly reduces or prevents a higher-order mode spurious response. This can reduce the insertion loss in the pass band of the second filter 21.

The following describes preferred embodiments of the present invention in detail with reference to examples and the drawings. All of the preferred embodiments described below provide general or specific examples. The values, shapes, materials, components, the arrangements and connection forms of the components, and the like, which are provided in the following preferred embodiments, are examples and are not intended to limit the present invention. The components mentioned in the following preferred embodiments are described as optional components unless they are specified in the independent claims. In addition, the components shown in the drawings are not representative of exact proportions or dimensions. Additionally, in the drawings, substantially the same structural elements are denoted by the same numerals, and any redundant description will be omitted or may be briefly given. In the following preferred embodiments, the term “connected” includes directly connected and electrically connected via any other element and the like.

Preferred Embodiment 1

The multiplexer 1 according to Preferred Embodiment 1 of the present invention will be described with reference to FIG. 1 and FIG. 5 to FIG. 10. Some components are redundant in Preferred Embodiment 1 and the comparative example described above, and such redundant components will also be described again in Preferred Embodiment 1.

1-1. Configuration of Multiplexer

The multiplexer 1 of Preferred Embodiment 1 is a multiplexer (splitter) including a plurality of filters having different pass bands, in which antenna-side terminals of the plurality of filters are connected together to a common terminal Port1. Specifically, as shown in FIG. 1, the multiplexer 1 includes the common terminal Port1, a first terminal Port11, a second terminal Port21, a first filter 11, and a second filter 21.

The common terminal Port1 is common to the first filter 11 and the second filter 21 and is connected to the first filter 11 and the second filter 21 within the multiplexer 1. Further, the common terminal Port1 is connected to an antenna element 2 outside the multiplexer 1. That is, the common terminal Port1 is also an antenna terminal of the multiplexer 1.

The first terminal Port11 is connected to the first filter 11 within the multiplexer 1. The second terminal Port21 is connected to the second filter 21 within the multiplexer 1. The first terminal Port11 and the second terminal Port21 are connected to an RF signal processing circuit (RFIC: Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit, not shown) outside the multiplexer 1 via an amplifier circuit or the like (not shown).

The first filter 11 is arranged on a first path r1 connecting the common terminal Port1 and the first terminal Port11. The first filter 11 is a receive filter whose pass band is, for example, the downlink frequency band (receive band) in Band L (low band).

The second filter 21 is arranged on a second path r2 connecting the common terminal Port1 and the second terminal Port21. The second filter 21 is a receive filter whose pass band is, for example, the downlink frequency band (receive band) in Band H (high band).

Preferable characteristics for the first filter 11 and the second filter 21 are that the frequency bands (receive band or transmit band) in their corresponding Bands are passed, while the other bands are attenuated. In the present preferred embodiment, the second filter 21 is set to have a frequency pass band higher than the first filter 11.

The first path r1 and the second path r2 are connected to each other at a node N. That is, the node N is a point at which the first path r1 and the second path r2 are connected together. In the multiplexer 1, an impedance element, for example, an inductor for impedance matching may be connected to the first path r1 connecting the first filter 11 and the node N and to the second path r2 connecting the second filter 21 and the node N, or to a path connecting the node N and the common terminal Port1, for example.

1-2. Configuration of Filter

Next, the configuration of the first filter 11 and the second filter 21 will be described taking as an example the first filter 11 whose pass band is the Band L.

FIG. 5 is a circuit diagram showing the first filter 11. As shown in FIG. 5, the first filter 11 includes acoustic wave resonators, namely, series resonators 111 s, 112 s, 113 s, and 114 s and parallel resonators 111 p, 112 p, and 113 p. All or some of the series resonators 111 s to 114 s and the parallel resonators 111 p to 113 p are hereinafter sometimes referred to as “resonators 110”.

The series resonators 111 s to 114 s are connected in series with each other along the first path (series arm) r1 connecting the common terminal Port1 and the first terminal Port11 in the stated order from the common terminal Port1 side. The parallel resonators 111 p to 113 p are provided on paths (parallel arms) connecting nodes n1, n2, and n3, each of which lies between adjacent ones of the series resonators 111 s to 114 s along the first path r1, and a reference terminal (ground) such that the parallel resonators 111 p to 113 p are connected in parallel to each other. Specifically, the series resonator (first series resonator) 111 s, which is the closest to the common terminal Port1, is connected to the common terminal Port1 without the parallel resonators 111 p to 113 p therebetween. The parallel resonator that is the closest to the common terminal Port1 among the parallel resonators 111 p to 113 p is the parallel resonator (first parallel resonator) 111 p. A first end of each of the parallel resonators 111 p to 113 p is connected to any one of the nodes n1, n2, and n3, and a second end thereof is connected to the reference terminal.

As described above, the first filter 11 has a T-type ladder filter structure defined by two or more series resonators (in this preferred embodiment, four series resonators, for example) arranged on the first path r1 and one or more parallel resonators (in this preferred embodiment, three parallel resonators, for example) each arranged on a path connecting the first path r1 and the reference terminal (ground).

The number of series resonators and the number of parallel resonators of the first filter 11 are not limited to four and three, respectively, and the first filter 11 may include two or more series resonators and one or more parallel resonators. The parallel resonator(s) may be connected to the reference terminal via an inductor. Further, an impedance element, for example, an inductor and a capacitor may be added or connected to a series arm or a parallel arm. While the parallel resonators are connected to individual reference terminals in FIG. 5, individual reference terminals or a shared reference terminal may be selected in accordance with, for example, the constraints of the mounting layout of the first filter 11.

1-3. Structure of Acoustic Wave Resonator

Next, the basic structure of the resonators 110 defining the first filter 11 will be described. The resonators 110 in this preferred embodiment are preferably surface acoustic wave (SAW) resonators, for example.

The other filter, that is, the second filter 21, may not have the configuration described above and may be designed, for example, in accordance with the predetermined filter characteristics and the like. Specifically, the second filter 21 may not have a ladder filter structure, and may have, for example, a longitudinally-coupled filter structure. Each of the resonators defining the second filter 21 is not limited to a SAW resonator and may be a BAW (Bulk Acoustic Wave) resonator, for example. Alternatively, the second filter 21 may be provided without using resonators and may be a LC resonant filter or a dielectric filter, for example.

FIG. 6 includes a plan view and a cross-sectional view showing each of the resonators 110 of the first filter 11. The resonator 110 shown in FIG. 6 is used to describe a typical structure of the resonator 110 described above, and the number and length of electrode fingers defining each electrode are not limited to the shown ones.

As shown in the plan view in FIG. 6, the resonator 110 includes a pair of opposing comb-shaped electrodes 32 a and 32 b, and reflectors 32 c arranged relative to the pair of comb-shaped electrodes 32 a and 32 b in an acoustic wave propagation direction D1. The pair of comb-shaped electrodes 32 a and 32 b form an IDT electrode 32.

The comb-shaped electrode 32 a is defined by a plurality of parallel electrode fingers 322 a arranged in comb rows, and a busbar electrode 321 a that connects first ends e1 of the plurality of electrode fingers 322 a to each other. The comb-shaped electrode 32 b is defined by a plurality of parallel electrode fingers 322 b arranged in comb rows, and a busbar electrode 321 b that connects first ends of the plurality of electrode fingers 322 b to each other. The pluralities of electrode fingers 322 a and 322 b extend in a direction perpendicular or substantially perpendicular to the acoustic wave propagation direction D1.

The reflectors 32 c, which are paired with each other, are arranged relative to the pair of comb-shaped electrodes 32 a and 32 b in the acoustic wave propagation direction D1. Specifically, the pair of comb-shaped electrodes 32 a and 32 b are disposed between the pair of reflectors 32 c in the acoustic wave propagation direction D1. Each of the reflectors 32 c is defined by a plurality of parallel reflection electrode fingers and reflector busbar electrodes that connect the plurality of reflection electrode fingers to each other. In the pair of reflectors 32 c, the reflector busbar electrodes are formed to extend in the acoustic wave propagation direction D1.

An imaginary line L1 obtained by connecting second ends e2 of the plurality of electrode fingers 322 a (ends of the plurality of electrode fingers 322 a that are not connected to the busbar electrode 321 a) to each other intersects a reference line L0, which is a straight line extending in the acoustic wave propagation direction D1, at a slant angle α, which is a predetermined angle. Further, an imaginary line L1 a obtained by connecting the first ends e1 of the plurality of electrode fingers 322 a (ends of the plurality of electrode fingers 322 a that are connected to the busbar electrode 321 a) to each other is parallel to the imaginary line L1 and intersects the reference line L0 at the slant angle α. An imaginary line obtained by connecting second ends of the plurality of electrode fingers 322 b to each other and an imaginary line obtained by connecting the first ends of the plurality of electrode fingers 322 b to each other also intersect the reference line L0 at the slant angle α. Accordingly, the individual IDT electrodes 32 defining the resonators 110 are slanted IDTs in which the acoustic wave propagation direction D1 intersects the direction in which the pluralities of electrode fingers 322 a and 322 b are arranged.

In a one-port resonator that includes a surface acoustic wave, the transverse-mode ripple is generated between the resonant frequency and the anti-resonant frequency and may deteriorate the transmission characteristics in the pass band. To address the deterioration, the first filter 11 according to this preferred embodiment includes a slanted IDT as the IDT electrode 32 of the resonator 110. In the first filter 11 according to this preferred embodiment, furthermore, the series resonators 111 s to 114 s and the parallel resonators 111 p to 113 p have a structure described below to significantly reduce or prevent the higher-order mode spurious response described above.

FIG. 7A is a plan view showing the series resonator 111 s, which is the closest to the common terminal Port1 in the first filter 11. FIG. 7B is a plan view showing the parallel resonator 111 p, which is the closest to the common terminal Port1 in the first filter 11. FIG. 7C is a plan view showing the other acoustic wave resonators 112 s to 114 s, 112 p, and 113 p, different from the series resonator 111 s and the parallel resonator 111 p, in the first filter 11.

As shown in FIGS. 7A and 7B, in the first filter 11, the series resonator 111 s and the parallel resonator 111 p have different slant angles. As shown in FIGS. 7A and 7C, in the first filter 11, the series resonator 111 s has a different slant angle from the other acoustic wave resonators 112 s to 114 s, 112 p, and 113 p.

Specifically, as shown in FIG. 7A, the angle defined by the reference line L0 and the imaginary line L1 of the series resonator 111 s is represented by a first slant angle α1, as shown in FIG. 7B, the angle defined by the reference line L0 and the imaginary line L1 of the parallel resonator 111 p is represented by a second slant angle α2, and, as shown in FIG. 7C, the angle defined by the reference line L0 and the imaginary line L1 of each of the acoustic wave resonators 112 s to 114 s, 112 p, and 113 p is represented by a third slant angle α3. In this case, the relationship of the first slant angle α1>the second slant angle α2 and the first slant angle α1>the third slant angle α3 is satisfied. The first slant angle α1 is selected as appropriate preferably from within a range greater than or equal to about 2.5° and less than or equal to about 10°, for example. The resonators 110 defining the first filter 11 have the configuration described above, thus significantly reducing or preventing the higher-order mode spurious response in the stop band of the first filter 11 while significantly reducing or preventing generation of the transverse-mode ripple.

The respective third slant angles α3 of the acoustic wave resonators 112 s to 114 s, 112 p, and 113 p may be the same or different.

1-4. Cross-Sectional Structure of Acoustic Wave Resonator

Referring back to FIG. 6, the cross-sectional structure of each of the resonators 110 will be described.

As shown in the cross-sectional view in FIG. 6, the IDT electrode 32, which is defined by the pluralities of electrode fingers 322 a and 322 b and the busbar electrodes 321 a and 321 b, has a multilayer structure of a close-contact layer 324 and a main electrode layer 325. The cross-sectional structure of the reflectors 32 c is similar to the cross-sectional structure of the IDT electrode 32 and will not be described hereinafter.

The close-contact layer 324 is a layer that enhances close contact between a piezoelectric layer 327 and the main electrode layer 325 and is preferably made of Ti, for example. The close-contact layer 324 preferably has a film thickness of, for example, about 12 nm.

The main electrode layer 325 is preferably made of, for example, Al including about 1% Cu. The main electrode layer 325 preferably has a film thickness of, for example, about 162 nm.

A protection layer 326 is provided on an outer surface of the IDT electrode 32 and a substrate 320 and covers the IDT electrode 32 and the substrate 320. The protection layer 326 protects the main electrode layer 325 from the external environment, adjusts the frequency-temperature characteristic, improves moisture resistance, and other purposes and is a film preferably including, for example, silicon dioxide as a main component. The protection layer 326 preferably has a film thickness of, for example, about 25 nm.

The IDT electrode 32 and the reflectors 32 c having the configuration described above are arranged on a principal surface of the substrate 320 described below. The following describes a multilayer structure of the substrate 320 in this preferred embodiment.

As shown in the bottom portion of FIG. 6, the substrate 320 has a structure including a high-acoustic-velocity support substrate 329, a low-acoustic-velocity film 328, and the piezoelectric layer 327 such that the high-acoustic-velocity support substrate 329, the low-acoustic-velocity film 328, and the piezoelectric layer 327 are stacked on one another in the stated order.

The piezoelectric layer 327 is a piezoelectric film having the IDT electrode 32 and the reflectors 32 c arranged on a principal surface thereof. The piezoelectric layer 327 is preferably made of, for example, a 50° Y-cut X-propagation LiTaO₃ piezoelectric single crystal or piezoelectric ceramics (lithium tantalate single crystal cut along a plane whose normal lies along the axis rotated by about 50° from the Y axis about the X axis or ceramics, with surface acoustic waves propagating through the single crystal or ceramics along the X axis). The thickness of the piezoelectric layer 327 is preferably less than or equal to about 3.5λ, for example, where λ denotes the wave length of an acoustic wave determined by the electrode pitch of the IDT electrode 32, and is, for example, about 600 nm.

The high-acoustic-velocity support substrate 329 is a substrate that supports the low-acoustic-velocity film 328, the piezoelectric layer 327, and the IDT electrode 32. The acoustic velocity of a bulk wave in the high-acoustic-velocity support substrate 329 is higher than that of a surface acoustic wave or a boundary acoustic wave propagating in the piezoelectric layer 327, and functions to confine a surface acoustic wave in a portion where the piezoelectric layer 327 and the low-acoustic-velocity film 328 are stacked on each other and not to permit leakage downward from the high-acoustic-velocity support substrate 329. The high-acoustic-velocity support substrate 329 is preferably, for example, a silicon substrate having a thickness of, for example, 125 μm.

The acoustic velocity of a bulk wave in the low-acoustic-velocity film 328 is lower than the acoustic velocity of a bulk wave propagating in the piezoelectric layer 327. The low-acoustic-velocity film 328 is located between the piezoelectric layer 327 and the high-acoustic-velocity support substrate 329. Due to this structure and the intrinsic properties of an acoustic wave whose energy is concentrated in a low-acoustic-velocity medium, surface acoustic wave energy is prevented from leaking outside the IDT electrode 32. The low-acoustic-velocity film 328 is a film preferably including, for example, silicon dioxide as a main component. The thickness of the low-acoustic-velocity film 328 is preferably less than or equal to about 2λ, for example, where X denotes the wave length of an acoustic wave determined by the electrode pitch of the IDT electrode 32, and is preferably, for example, about 670 nm.

In the multilayer structure of the substrate 320 in this preferred embodiment described above, the Q values at the resonant frequency and the anti-resonant frequency can be significantly increased compared with the structure of the related art in which, for example, a piezoelectric substrate is used as a single layer. In the multilayer structure described above, however, due to the high efficiency of confinement of acoustic wave energy in the thickness direction of the substrate 320, the higher-order mode spurious response generated by the resonator 110 is less likely to attenuate and remains. In the resonator 110 of this preferred embodiment having the multilayer structure described above, therefore, the higher-order mode spurious response is further significantly reduced or prevented. In this preferred embodiment, as described above, the series resonator 111 s, which is the closest to the common terminal Port1, has a larger slant angle than the other acoustic wave resonators 112 s to 114 s and 111 p to 113 p, different from the series resonator 111 s, and the higher-order mode spurious response of the first filter 11 can be significantly reduced or prevented.

1-5. Advantageous Effects, etc.

FIG. 8 is a diagram showing a change in the impedance of the acoustic wave resonator 110 according to Preferred Embodiment 1. Specifically, FIG. 8 is a diagram showing the relationships between frequency and impedance when the first slant angle α1 of the series resonator 111 s changes.

As shown in FIG. 8, in the series resonator 111 s, an impedance disturbance occurs at a frequency of about 2990 MHz, which is in the stop band of the first filter 11, and a higher-order mode spurious response appears. When observed for increments of the first slant angle α1, the impedance disturbance is large when the first slant angle α1 is equal to about 0°, with the impedance disturbance decreasing as the first slant angle α1 increases stepwise, for example, about 2.5°, about 5°, about 7.5°, and about 10°. For example, when the first slant angle α1 is greater than or equal to about 2.5° and less than or equal to about 10°, the impedance disturbance in the stop band of the first filter 11 is small, and the higher-order mode spurious response decreases.

FIG. 9 is a diagram showing the relationships between frequency and phase for the acoustic wave resonator 110, in which the impedance shown in FIG. 8 is converted into the phase using the S parameter. In the impedance-to-phase conversion, differences in higher-order mode spurious response when the first slant angle α1 changes appear markedly as differences in phase.

As shown in FIG. 9, in the series resonator 111 s, the phase increases in the stop band of the first filter 11, and a higher-order mode spurious response appears. When observed for increments of the first slant angle α1, the phase is large when the first slant angle α1 is equal to about 0°, with the phase decreasing as the first slant angle α1 increases stepwise. For example, when the first slant angle α1 is greater than or equal to about 2.5° and less than or equal to about 10°, the phase in the stop band of the first filter 11 is small, and a higher-order mode spurious response decreases. In FIG. 8 and FIG. 9, a stop band response appears at a frequency of about 2700 MHz. The stop band response can be reduced by any other method.

FIG. 10 is a diagram showing the relationship between the first slant angle α1 of the acoustic wave resonator 110 and the phase. Specifically, in FIG. 10, the maximum value of the phase is plotted for increments of the first slant angle α1 on a graph whose horizontal axis represents the first slant angle α1 of the series resonator 111 s shown in FIG. 9 and whose vertical axis represents phase.

As shown in FIG. 10, in the series resonator 111 s, the phase is large when the first slant angle α1 is equal to about 0°, and the phase becomes small when the first slant angle α1 is greater than or equal to about 2.5° and less than or equal to about 10°. As in FIGS. 8 to 10, setting the first slant angle α1 of the series resonator 111 s to be greater than or equal to about 2.5° and less than or equal to about 10° can make the impedance disturbance and the phase small and can significantly reduce or prevent generation of the higher-order mode spurious response.

The multiplexer 1 according to this preferred embodiment includes the common terminal Port1, the first terminal Port11, the second terminal Port21, the first filter 11 arranged on the first path r1 connecting the common terminal Port1 and the first terminal Port11, the first filter 11 including the plurality of acoustic wave resonators 111 s to 114 s and 111 p to 113 p, and the second filter 21 arranged on the second path r2 connecting the common terminal Port1 and the second terminal Port21, the second filter 21 having a pass band that is higher in frequency than the first filter 11. The plurality of acoustic wave resonators include two or more series resonators (for example, the series resonators 111 s to 114 s) arranged on the first path r1, and one or more parallel resonators (for example, the parallel resonators 111 p to 113 p) each arranged on a path connecting one of the nodes n1 to n3 on the first path r1 and ground. The first series resonator 111 s, which is the closest to the common terminal Port1 among the two or more series resonators 111 s to 114 s, is connected to the common terminal Port1 without the parallel resonators 111 p to 113 p therebetween. Each of the plurality of acoustic wave resonators includes the IDT electrode 32, which is defined by the pair of comb-shaped electrodes 32 a and 32 b formed on the substrate 320 having piezoelectricity. Each of the pair of comb-shaped electrodes 32 a and 32 b of each of the plurality of acoustic wave resonators includes the pluralities of electrode fingers 322 a and 322 b that extend in a direction perpendicular or substantially perpendicular to the acoustic wave propagation direction D1, and the busbar electrodes 321 a and 321 b that connect first ends of the pluralities of electrode fingers 322 a and 322 b to each other. The imaginary line L1 obtained by connecting the second ends e2 of the plurality of electrode fingers 322 a included in a comb-shaped electrode (for example, the comb-shaped electrode 32 a) among the pair of comb-shaped electrodes 32 a and 32 b to each other intersect the reference line L0, which is a straight line extending in the acoustic wave propagation direction D1. When an angle defined by the reference line L0 and the imaginary line L1 of the first series resonator 111 s is represented by the first slant angle α1, an angle defined by the reference line L0 and the imaginary line L1 of the first parallel resonator 111 p, which is the closest to the common terminal Port1 among the one or more parallel resonators 111 p to 113 p, is represented by the second slant angle α2, and an angle defined by the reference line L0 and the imaginary line L1 of the rest of the plurality of acoustic wave resonators 112 s to 114 s, 112 p, and 113 p is represented by the third slant angle α3, at least one of the first slant angle α1 and the second slant angle α2 is larger than the third slant angle α3.

As described above, in each of the resonators 110 included in the first filter 11, the IDT electrode 32 is arranged such that the imaginary line L1 and the reference line L0 intersect, that is, the IDT electrode 32 is slanted relative to the acoustic wave propagation direction D1. This arrangement can significantly reduce or prevent generation of the transverse-mode ripple in each of the resonators 110. In addition, the IDT electrode 32 of the series resonator 111 s, which is the closest to the common terminal Port1, is more slanted than the IDT electrodes 32 of the other acoustic wave resonators 112 s to 114 s and 111 p to 113 p. This arrangement can significantly reduce or prevent generation of the higher-order mode spurious response of the series resonator 111 s, which largely affects the second filter 21. Therefore, it is possible to significantly reduce or prevent the higher-order mode spurious response of the first filter 11 and to reduce the insertion loss in the pass band of the second filter 21.

Modification 1 of Preferred Embodiment 1

In the multiplexer 1 according to Modification 1 of Preferred Embodiment 1, the parallel resonator that is the closest to the common terminal Port1 among one or more parallel resonators has a larger slant angle than the subsequent resonator(s).

FIG. 11 is a circuit configuration diagram of a first filter 11 according to Modification 1 of Preferred Embodiment 1. The first filter 11 according to Modification 1 includes a parallel resonator 111 a in place of the parallel resonator 111 p provided in Preferred Embodiment 1. The parallel resonator 111 a is positioned closest to the common terminal Port1 among the plurality of parallel resonators 111 a, 112 p, and 113 p.

FIG. 12 is a plan view showing the parallel resonator 111 a, which is the closest to the common terminal Port1 in the first filter 11 of Modification 1. In the first filter 11 of Modification 1, the parallel resonator 111 a has a different slant angle from the other parallel resonators 112 p and 113 p, different from the parallel resonator 111 a.

Specifically, as shown in FIG. 12, when the angle defined by the reference line L0 and the imaginary line L1 of the parallel resonator 111 a is represented by a second slant angle α2, the relationship of the second slant angle α2>the third slant angle α3 is satisfied. The second slant angle α2 is selected as appropriate preferably from within a range greater than or equal to about 2.5° and less than or equal to about 10°, for example. The second slant angle α2 may be the same or substantially the same angle as the first slant angle α1.

In the multiplexer 1 according to Modification 1 of Preferred Embodiment 1, when the angle defined by the reference line L0 and the imaginary line L1 of the parallel resonator 111 a, which is the closest to the common terminal Port1 among the one or more parallel resonators 111 a, 112 p, and 113 p, is represented by a second slant angle α2, the second slant angle α2 is larger than the third slant angle α3 described above. Among the parallel resonators 111 a, 112 p, and 113 p defining the first filter 11, the parallel resonator 111 a, which affects the second filter 21, has the configuration described above, thereby further significantly reducing or preventing the higher-order mode spurious response in the stop band of the first filter 11.

Modification 2 of Preferred Embodiment 1

In the multiplexer 1 according to Modification 2 of Preferred Embodiment 1, the series resonator 111 s of the first filter 11 is defined by separate resonators.

FIG. 13 is a circuit configuration diagram of a first filter 11 according to Modification 2 of Preferred Embodiment 1. As shown in FIG. 13, in the multiplexer 1 according to Modification 2, the series resonator 111 s of the first filter 11 is defined by two series resonators 111 b and 111 c, which are arranged in series. Among the series resonators 111 b and 111 c, the series resonator 111 b, which is the closest to the common terminal Port1, has the first slant angle α1. The series resonator 111 c positioned between the series resonator 111 b and the node n1 also has the first slant angle α1.

In the multiplexer 1 according to Modification 2 of Preferred Embodiment 1, the first slant angle α1 of the series resonators 111 b and 111 c of the series resonator 111 s, which is the closest to the common terminal Port1, is set to be larger than the third slant angle α3 of the acoustic wave resonators 112 s to 114 s, 112 p, and 113 p positioned subsequent to the node n1. This can significantly reduce or prevent the higher-order mode spurious response generated in the stop band of the first filter 11.

Preferred Embodiment 2

The multiplexer 1 of Preferred Embodiment 2 of the present invention includes a first filter 11A having a 7L-type ladder filter structure, which is different from the first filter of Preferred Embodiment 1 having a T-type ladder filter structure.

FIG. 14 is a circuit configuration diagram of the first filter 11A of the multiplexer 1 according to Preferred Embodiment 2. As shown in FIG. 14, the first filter 11A includes series resonators 111 s to 114 s and parallel resonators 111 d and 111 p to 113 p.

The series resonators 111 s to 114 s are provided on a first path (series arm) r1 connecting the common terminal Port1 and the first terminal Port11 such that the series resonators 111 s to 114 s are connected in series with each other in the stated order from the common terminal Port1 side. The parallel resonators 111 d and 111 p to 113 p include the parallel resonator (first parallel resonator) 111 d positioned on the common terminal Port1 side, and the parallel resonators 111 p to 113 p positioned on the first terminal Port11 side, as seen from the series resonator (first series resonator) 111 s, which is the closest to the common terminal Port1 among the series resonators 111 s to 114 s. The parallel resonator 111 d is connected to a path (parallel arm) connecting a node n0 between the common terminal Port1 and the series resonator 111 s and the reference terminal (ground). Specifically, the parallel resonator 111 d, which is the closest to the common terminal Port1, is connected to the common terminal Port1 without the series resonators 111 s to 114 s therebetween. The parallel resonators 111 p to 113 p are provided on paths connecting the nodes n1, n2, and n3, each of which lies between adjacent ones of the series resonators 111 s to 114 s along the first path r1, and the reference terminal such that the parallel resonators 111 p to 113 p are connected in parallel to each other.

Accordingly, the first filter 11A has a n-type ladder filter structure defined by one or more series resonators (for example, the four series resonators 111 s to 114 s) arranged on the first path r1, and two or more parallel resonators (for example, the four parallel resonators 111 d and 111 p to 113 p) arranged on paths connecting the first path r1 and the reference terminal.

FIG. 15A is a plan view showing the parallel resonator 111 d, which is the closest to the common terminal Port1 in the first filter 11A. FIG. 15B is a plan view showing the series resonator 111 s, which is the closest to the common terminal Port1 in the first filter 11A. FIG. 15C is a plan view showing the other acoustic wave resonators 112 s to 114 s and 111 p to 113 p, different from the parallel resonator 111 d and the series resonator 111 s and, in the first filter 11A.

As shown in FIGS. 15A and 15B, in the first filter 11A, the parallel resonator 111 d and the series resonator 111 s have different slant angles. As shown in FIGS. 15A and 15C, in the first filter 11A, the parallel resonator 111 d has a different slant angle from the other acoustic wave resonators 112 s to 114 s and 111 p to 113 p.

Specifically, as shown in FIG. 15A, the angle defined by the reference line L0 and the imaginary line L1 of the parallel resonator 111 d is represented by a first slant angle α1, as shown in FIG. 15B, the angle defined by the reference line L0 and the imaginary line L1 of the series resonator 111 s is represented by a second slant angle α2, and, as shown in FIG. 15C, the angle defined by the reference line L0 and the imaginary line L1 of each of the other acoustic wave resonators 112 s to 114 s and 111 p to 113 p is represented by a third slant angle α3. In this case, the relationship of the first slant angle α1>the second slant angle α2 and the first slant angle α1>the third slant angle α3 is satisfied. The first slant angle α1 is selected as appropriate preferably from within a range greater than or equal to about 2.5° and less than or equal to about 10°, for example. The resonators 110 defining the first filter 11A have the configuration described above, thereby significantly reducing or preventing the higher-order mode spurious response generated in the stop band of the first filter 11A while significantly reducing or preventing generation of the transverse-mode ripple.

The respective third slant angles α3 of the acoustic wave resonators 112 s to 114 s and 111 p to 113 p may be the same or different.

In Preferred Embodiment 2 described above, only the parallel resonator 111 d has the first slant angle α1, by way of example but not limitation. The series resonator 111 s may also have a larger slant angle than the third slant angle α3.

That is, when the angle defined by the reference line L0 and the imaginary line L1 of the series resonator 111 s, which is the closest to the common terminal Port1 among one or more series resonators (for example, the series resonators 111 s to 114 s), is represented by a second slant angle α2, the second slant angle α2 may be larger than the third slant angle α3. The second slant angle α2 is selected as appropriate preferably from within a range greater than or equal to about 2.5° and less than or equal to about 10°, for example. The second slant angle α2 may be the same angle as the first slant angle α1. The series resonator 111 s, which is the closest to the common terminal Port1 among the series resonators 111 s to 114 s defining the first filter 11A of Preferred Embodiment 2, has the configuration described above, thereby further significantly reducing or preventing the higher-order mode spurious response generated in the stop band of the first filter 11A.

(Modification 1 of Preferred Embodiment 2)

In the multiplexer 1 according to Modification 1 of Preferred Embodiment 2, the parallel resonator 111 d of the first filter 11A is defined by separate resonators.

FIG. 16 is a circuit configuration diagram of a first filter 11A according to Modification 1 of Preferred Embodiment 2. As shown in FIG. 16, the first filter 11A includes the series resonators 111 s to 114 s and the parallel resonators 111 d and 111 p to 113 p. The parallel resonator 111 d is defined by separate parallel resonators 111 e, 111 f, 111 g, and 111 h.

The parallel resonators 111 e and 111 f are connected in series with each other and are connected to a path connecting a node n0 between the common terminal Port1 and the series resonator 111 s and the reference terminal. The parallel resonators 111 g and 111 h are connected in series with each other and are connected to a path connecting a node n0 between the common terminal Port1 and the series resonator 111 s and the reference terminal. Specifically, the parallel resonators 111 e and 111 f, which are the closest to the common terminal Port1, are connected to the node n0 without the series resonators 111 s to 114 s therebetween. The parallel resonators 111 g and 111 h, which are the second closest to the common terminal Port1, are connected to the node n0 without the series resonators 111 s to 114 s therebetween.

Accordingly, the first filter 11A has a n-type ladder filter structure defined by one or more series resonators arranged on the first path r1 and two or more parallel resonators (for example, the seven parallel resonators 111 e to 111 h and 111 p to 113 p) arranged on paths connecting the first path r1 and the reference terminal.

In Modification 1 of Preferred Embodiment 2, when the angle defined by the reference line L0 and the imaginary line L1 of each of the parallel resonators 111 e to 111 h is represented by a first slant angle α1, and the angle defined by the reference line L0 and the imaginary line L1 of each of the acoustic wave resonators 112 s to 114 s and 111 p to 113 p is represented by a third slant angle α3, the relationship of the first slant angle α1>the third slant angle α3 is satisfied. The resonators 110 defining the first filter 11A has the configuration described above, thereby significantly reducing or preventing the higher-order mode spurious response generated in the stop band of the first filter 11A.

Preferred Embodiment 3

The multiplexer according to Preferred Embodiments 1 and 2 described above and their modifications can be applied to a high-frequency front-end circuit and further to a communication device including the high-frequency front-end circuit. In this preferred embodiment, the high-frequency front-end circuit and the communication device will be described.

FIG. 17 is a configuration diagram of a high-frequency front-end circuit 30 according to Preferred Embodiment 3. In FIG. 17, an antenna element 2, an RF signal processing circuit (RFIC) 3, and a baseband signal processing circuit (BBIC) 4, which are connected to the high-frequency front-end circuit 30, are also shown. The high-frequency front-end circuit 30, the RF signal processing circuit 3, and the baseband signal processing circuit 4 define a communication device 40.

The high-frequency front-end circuit 30 includes the multiplexer 1 according to Preferred Embodiment 1, a receive-side switch 13, a transmit-side switch 23, a low-noise amplifier circuit 14, and a power amplifier circuit 24.

The multiplexer 1 includes four filters. Specifically, the multiplexer 1 includes a filter 12 and a filter 22 in addition to the first filter 11 and the second filter 21. The filter 12 is a transmit filter whose pass band is the uplink frequency band (transmit band) and is arranged on a path connecting the common terminal Port1 and an individual terminal Port12. The filter 22 is a transmit filter whose pass band is the uplink frequency band (transmit band) and is arranged on a path connecting the common terminal Port1 and an individual terminal Port22.

The receive-side switch 13 is a switch circuit including two selection terminals individually connected to the first terminal Port11 and the second terminal Port21, which are output terminals of the multiplexer 1, and a common terminal connected to the low-noise amplifier circuit 14.

The transmit-side switch 23 is a switch circuit including two selection terminals individually connected to the individual terminals Port12 and Port22, which are input terminals of the multiplexer 1, and a common terminal connected to the power amplifier circuit 24.

The receive-side switch 13 and the transmit-side switch 23 are each preferably defined by, for example, a SPDT (Single Pole Double Throw) switch that connects the common terminal to a signal path corresponding to a predetermined band in accordance with a control signal from a control unit (not shown). The number of selection terminals to be connected to the common terminal is not limited to one, and a plurality of selection terminals may be connected to the common terminal. That is, the high-frequency front-end circuit 30 may support carrier aggregation.

The low-noise amplifier circuit 14 is a receive amplifier circuit that amplifies a high-frequency signal (here, a high-frequency receive signal) that has passed through the antenna element 2, the multiplexer 1, and the receive-side switch 13 and outputs the amplified signal to the RF signal processing circuit 3.

The power amplifier circuit 24 is a transmit amplifier circuit that amplifies a high-frequency signal (here, a high-frequency transmit signal) output from the RF signal processing circuit 3 and outputs the amplified signal to the antenna element 2 via the transmit-side switch 23 and the multiplexer 1.

The RF signal processing circuit 3 performs signal processing, for example, down-conversion, on a high-frequency receive signal input from the antenna element 2 via a receive signal path and outputs a receive signal generated through the signal processing to the baseband signal processing circuit 4. Further, the RF signal processing circuit 3 performs signal processing, for example, up-conversion, on a transmit signal input from the baseband signal processing circuit 4 and outputs a high-frequency transmit signal generated through the signal processing to the power amplifier circuit 24. The RF signal processing circuit 3 is an RFIC, for example.

The signal processed by the baseband signal processing circuit 4 is, for example, an image signal to be used to display an image, or an audio signal to be used for the telephone conversation.

The high-frequency front-end circuit 30 may include any other circuit element between the components described above.

The high-frequency front-end circuit 30 and the communication device 40 having the configuration described above include the multiplexer 1 according to Preferred Embodiment 1 described above. This can significantly reduce or prevent the higher-order mode spurious response generated outside the pass band of the first filter 11 and reduce the insertion loss in the pass band of the second filter 21.

The high-frequency front-end circuit 30 may include, in place of the first filter 11 of the multiplexer 1 according to Preferred Embodiment 1, the first filter 11 of Modification 1 of Preferred Embodiment 1 or the first filter 11A according to Preferred Embodiment 2 and Modification 1 of Preferred Embodiment 2.

The communication device 40 may not include the baseband signal processing circuit 4 depending on the method for processing a high-frequency signal.

Other Preferred Embodiments

Multiplexers, high-frequency front-end circuits, and communication devices according to preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described with reference to preferred embodiments and their modifications. The present invention may be carried out in other preferred embodiments implemented by combining any of the components in the preferred embodiments and modifications described above or in modifications obtained by making various modifications conceived of by a person skilled in the art to the preferred embodiments described above without departing from the spirit of the present invention. Other preferred embodiments, modifications, and various devices including a high-frequency front-end circuit and a communication device according to the present invention are also included in the present invention.

For example, Preferred Embodiment 3 described above describes a multiplexer including four filters, by way of example. However, the present invention is also applicable to, for example, a triplexer in which antenna terminals of three filters are shared, or a hexaplexer in which antenna terminals of six filters are shared. That is, the multiplexer preferably includes two or more filters.

Further, Preferred Embodiment 1 described above provides an example in which both the first filter and the second filter are receive filters. However, the present invention is applicable to a multiplexer in which the higher-order mode spurious response of a first filter lies in the pass band of a second filter, regardless of the use of the first and second filters and the like. Accordingly, at least one of the first and second filters may be a receive filter. The multiplexer may not have a configuration including both a transmit filter and a receive filter, and may have a configuration including only a transmit filter or only a receive filter.

Further, Preferred Embodiment 1 described above provides a non-limiting example in which each of the resonators 110 does not include offset electrode fingers (electrodes that protrude from busbar electrodes on opposite sides and face electrode fingers). Each resonator may include offset electrode fingers.

Further, the materials of the close-contact layer 324, the main electrode layer 325, and the protection layer 326 of the IDT electrode 32 and the reflectors 32 c are not limited to the materials described above. In addition, the IDT electrode 32 may not have the multilayer structure described above. The IDT electrode 32 may include a metal such as Ti, Al, Cu, Pt, Au, Ag, or Pd or an alloy of these metals, for example, or may be formed of a plurality of multilayer bodies including such metals or alloys. The protection layer 326 may not be formed.

Further, in the substrate 320 of the acoustic wave resonator 110 of Preferred Embodiment 1, the high-acoustic-velocity support substrate 329 may have a structure in which a support substrate and a high-acoustic-velocity film in which a bulk wave propagates at a higher acoustic velocity than that of a surface acoustic wave or a boundary acoustic wave that propagates in the piezoelectric layer 327 are stacked on each other.

Further, Preferred Embodiment 1 provides an example in which the IDT electrodes 32 defining the first filter 11 are provided on the substrate 320 having the piezoelectric layer 327. However, the substrate on which the IDT electrodes 32 are provided may be a piezoelectric substrate including the piezoelectric layer 327 as a single layer. In this case, the piezoelectric substrate is preferably made of, for example, a LiTaO₃ piezoelectric single crystal or any other piezoelectric single crystal such as LiNbO₃. The substrate 320 on which the IDT electrodes 32 are provided may use any suitable structure having piezoelectricity in which a piezoelectric layer is stacked on top of a support substrate, other than a structure that is entirely formed of a piezoelectric layer.

Further, the piezoelectric layer 327 according to Preferred Embodiment 1 described above includes a 50° Y-cut X-propagation LiTaO₃ single crystal. However, the cut angle of the single crystal material is not limited to this. That is, the multilayer structure, the material, and the thickness may be changed, for example, in accordance with the predetermined bandpass characteristics and the like of the acoustic wave filter device, and a surface acoustic wave filter that uses a LiTaO₃ piezoelectric substrate having a different cut angle from that described above, a LiNbO₃ piezoelectric substrate, or the like can also achieve similar advantageous effects.

Preferred embodiments of the present invention provide multiplexers, front-end circuits, and communication devices, which are each applicable to a multiband system, and can be widely used in communication equipment, for example, mobile phones.

While preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described above, it is to be understood that variations and modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention. The scope of the present invention, therefore, is to be determined solely by the following claims. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A multiplexer comprising: a common terminal, a first terminal, and a second terminal; a first filter provided on a first path electrically connecting the common terminal and the first terminal, the first filter including a plurality of acoustic wave resonators; and a second filter provided on a second path electrically connecting the common terminal and the second terminal, the second filter having a pass band that is higher in frequency than the first filter; wherein the plurality of acoustic wave resonators include: two or more series resonators provided on the first path; and one or more parallel resonators each provided on a path electrically connecting a first node on the first path and ground, a first series resonator that is closest to the common terminal among the two or more series resonators is electrically connected to the common terminal without the one or more parallel resonators therebetween; each of the plurality of acoustic wave resonators includes an interdigital transducer (IDT) electrode defined by a pair of comb-shaped electrodes provided on a substrate having piezoelectricity; each of the pair of comb-shaped electrodes of each of the plurality of acoustic wave resonators includes: a plurality of electrode fingers that extend in a direction perpendicular or substantially perpendicular to an acoustic wave propagation direction; and a busbar electrode that connects first ends of the plurality of electrode fingers to each other; an imaginary line obtained by connecting second ends of the plurality of electrode fingers included in one comb-shaped electrode among the pair of comb-shaped electrodes intersects a reference line that is a straight line extending in the acoustic wave propagation direction; and when an angle defined by the reference line and the imaginary line of the first series resonator is represented by a first slant angle, an angle defined by the reference line and the imaginary line of a first parallel resonator that is closest to the common terminal among the one or more parallel resonators is represented by a second slant angle, and an angle defined by the reference line and the imaginary line of the rest of the plurality of acoustic wave resonators is represented by a third slant angle, at least one of the first slant angle and the second slant angle is larger than the third slant angle.
 2. The multiplexer according to claim 1, wherein at least one of the first slant angle and the second slant angle is greater than or equal to about 2.5° and less than or equal to about 10°.
 3. The multiplexer according to claim 1, wherein each of the first slant angle and the second slant angle is larger than the third slant angle.
 4. A multiplexer comprising: a common terminal, a first terminal, and a second terminal; a first filter provided on a first path electrically connecting the common terminal and the first terminal, the first filter including a plurality of acoustic wave resonators; and a second filter provided on a second path electrically connecting the common terminal and the second terminal, the second filter having a pass band that is higher in frequency than the first filter; wherein the plurality of acoustic wave resonators include: one or more series resonators provided on the first path; and two or more parallel resonators provided on paths electrically connecting the first path and ground; the two or more parallel resonators include a first parallel resonator positioned on the common terminal side, and a parallel resonator positioned on the first terminal side, as viewed from a first series resonator that is closest to the common terminal among the one or more series resonators; each of the plurality of acoustic wave resonators includes an interdigital transducer (IDT) electrode defined by a pair of comb-shaped electrodes provided on a substrate having piezoelectricity; each of the pair of comb-shaped electrodes of each of the plurality of acoustic wave resonators includes: a plurality of electrode fingers that extend in a direction perpendicular or substantially perpendicular to an acoustic wave propagation direction; and a busbar electrode that connects first ends of the plurality of electrode fingers to each other; an imaginary line obtained by connecting second ends of the plurality of electrode fingers included in one comb-shaped electrode among the pair of comb-shaped electrodes intersects a reference line that is a straight line extending in the acoustic wave propagation direction; and when an angle defined by the reference line and the imaginary line of the first parallel resonator is represented by a first slant angle, an angle defined by the reference line and the imaginary line of the first series resonator is represented by a second slant angle, and an angle defined by the reference line and the imaginary line of the rest of the plurality of acoustic wave resonators is represented by a third slant angle, at least one of the first slant angle and the second slant angle is larger than the third slant angle.
 5. The multiplexer according to claim 4, wherein at least one of the first slant angle and the second slant angle is greater than or equal to about 2.5° and less than or equal to about 10°.
 6. The multiplexer according to claim 4, wherein each of the first slant angle and the second slant angle is larger than the third slant angle.
 7. The multiplexer according to claim 1, wherein the substrate includes: a piezoelectric layer including a principal surface on which the IDT electrodes are provided, a high-acoustic-velocity support substrate in which a bulk wave propagates at a higher acoustic velocity than an acoustic velocity of an acoustic wave that propagates in the piezoelectric layer; and a low-acoustic-velocity film that is provided between the high-acoustic-velocity support substrate and the piezoelectric layer and in which a bulk wave propagates at a lower acoustic velocity than an acoustic velocity of a bulk wave that propagates in the piezoelectric layer.
 8. The multiplexer according to claim 1, wherein a frequency of a higher-order mode spurious response generated by the first filter is included in the frequency pass band of the second filter.
 9. A high-frequency front-end circuit comprising: the multiplexer according to claim 1; and an amplifier circuit electrically connected to the multiplexer.
 10. A communication device comprising: an RF signal processing circuit that processes a high-frequency signal to be transmitted or received by an antenna element; and the high-frequency front-end circuit according to claim 9, the high-frequency front-end circuit transmitting the high-frequency signal between the antenna element and the RF signal processing circuit.
 11. A high-frequency front-end circuit comprising: the multiplexer according to claim 4; and an amplifier circuit electrically connected to the multiplexer.
 12. A communication device comprising: an RF signal processing circuit that processes a high-frequency signal to be transmitted or received by an antenna element; and the high-frequency front-end circuit according to claim 11, the high-frequency front-end circuit transmitting the high-frequency signal between the antenna element and the RF signal processing circuit.
 13. The communication device according to claim 10, wherein the antenna element is electrically connected to the common terminal.
 14. The multiplexer according to claim 1, wherein the first path and the second path are electrically connected to each other at a second node.
 15. The multiplexer according to claim 1, wherein plurality of acoustic wave resonators includes three or more series resonators and two or more parallel resonators.
 16. The multiplexer according to claim 1, wherein plurality of acoustic wave resonators includes four or more series resonators and three or more parallel resonators.
 17. The multiplexer according to claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of acoustic wave resonators is a surface acoustic wave (SAW) resonator or a bulk acoustic wave (BAW) resonator.
 18. The multiplexer according to claim 7, wherein the IDT electrode includes a close-contact layer and a main electrode layer, and the close-contact layer is provided between the piezoelectric layer and main electrode layer. 